Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Educational Forum
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Messages
Narrative Review
Original Article
Review Article
Special Invited Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Educational Forum
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Messages
Narrative Review
Original Article
Review Article
Special Invited Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Educational Forum
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Messages
Narrative Review
Original Article
Review Article
Special Invited Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/AUJMSR_11_2025

Prevalence and evaluation of pattern of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among aluminum workers

Department of Physiotherapy, Yobe State University, Damaturu, Yobe State, Nigeria
Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University Wukari, Taraba, Nigeria
Department of Physiotherapy, Federal Medical Centre Nguru, Yobe State, Nigeria.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Mahmud Ali Karaga, Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria. mahmudkaraga@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Dan Inu MA, Karaga MA, Abubakar IA, Saleh AB. Prevalence and evaluation of pattern of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among aluminum workers. Adesh Univ J Med Sci Res. doi: 10.25259/AUJMSR_11_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Aluminum industry workers often engage in physically demanding activities such as repetitive motions, heavy lifting, and extended periods of standing. These occupational demands increase their susceptibility to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Despite the economic significance of the aluminum sector in Maiduguri, there is limited data regarding the prevalence and impact of WMSDs within this workforce. This study aims to assess the occurrence, patterns, and contributing factors of WMSDs among aluminum workers in Maiduguri while proposing evidence-based measures to enhance workplace safety.

Material and Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 276 aluminum workers using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire to gather information on WMSD prevalence and associated risk factors. Data analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.

Results:

Findings revealed that 62.3% of participants experienced WMSDs within the past year. The most commonly affected areas were the lower back (71%), neck (62.3%), and right shoulder (43.1%). Key risk factors identified included prolonged work hours, repetitive tasks, and inadequate ergonomic training.

Conclusion:

WMSDs are widespread among aluminum workers in Maiduguri, with the lower back being the most frequently affected body region. Implementing ergonomic interventions and workplace safety programs is essential to reducing these occupational health risks.

Keywords

Aluminum workers
Ergonomic interventions
Maiduguri
Prevalence
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders

INTRODUCTION

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) pose a major public health challenge, impacting workers across diverse professions. These disorders involve injuries and discomfort affecting muscles, tendons, ligaments, and joints, primarily resulting from repetitive movements, awkward postures, and extended physical exertion.[1] On a global scale, WMSDs are a leading contributor to work-related disability, absenteeism, and reduced productivity, affecting both developed and developing nations.[2] The situation is particularly severe in low-income countries, where poor workplace conditions, limited ergonomic awareness, and inadequate preventive measures further exacerbate the burden of these disorders.[3]

The aluminum industry is one of the sectors where workers are exposed to significant physical strain. Employees frequently perform repetitive tasks, engage in heavy lifting, stand for long periods, and adopt awkward working postures. These occupational hazards are often intensified by additional environmental factors, such as exposure to vibrations and poor ergonomic conditions, making aluminum workers particularly vulnerable to WMSDs.[4] While international research has explored the prevalence of WMSDs in similar industries, there remains a scarcity of studies focusing specifically on aluminum workers in Maiduguri, Nigeria.

In Nigeria, research on WMSDs has primarily concentrated on professions such as healthcare providers, drivers, and factory workers, leaving aluminum workers – who face distinct ergonomic challenges – largely overlooked.[5,6] This gap in research limits the understanding of the extent and impact of WMSDs in this particular workforce.

The economic and social consequences of WMSDs are substantial. These disorders not only contribute to increased medical expenses but also lead to indirect costs such as lost productivity, work absenteeism, and decreased employee morale.[7] In physically demanding jobs like aluminum work, where employees engage in strenuous and repetitive activities, WMSDs tend to be particularly prevalent. Commonly affected body regions include the lower back, neck, shoulders, and wrists, with symptoms often linked to tasks such as lifting heavy materials, prolonged standing, and operating machinery in ergonomically unfavorable conditions.[8]

Although WMSDs are widely acknowledged as a major occupational health concern, there is limited research addressing their prevalence and associated risk factors among aluminum workers in developing nations like Nigeria. Existing studies on comparable labor-intensive professions have identified key ergonomic hazards, including extended working hours and inadequate rest periods. However, specific challenges faced by aluminum workers remain insufficiently explored.[9,10]

In Maiduguri, Borno State, aluminum workers operate under challenging conditions, with little to no ergonomic interventions, limited access to health education, and weak enforcement of occupational safety regulations. Understanding the prevalence and risk factors of WMSDs in this workforce is essential for developing targeted solutions that minimize health risks and enhance productivity. Therefore, this study seeks to examine the occurrence, patterns, and contributing factors of WMSDs among aluminum workers in Maiduguri. In addition, it highlights that the need for ergonomic training and policy reforms aimed at improving workplace safety. The findings will provide data-driven recommendations to support preventive strategies, enhance working environments, and promote the overall well-being of aluminum workers in the region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design and participants

This research employed a cross-sectional survey to assess WMSDs among full-time aluminum workers in Maiduguri, Nigeria. A purposive sampling method was used to select participants, with eligibility criteria requiring at least 1 year of work experience in the aluminum industry. Workers with pre-existing musculoskeletal disorders unrelated to their job, those with physical disabilities, or individuals unwilling to participate were excluded from the study.

Sample size and ethical approval

A total of 276 participants were recruited for the study. Ethical clearance was secured from the Research and Ethical Committee of the College of Medical Sciences, University of Maiduguri, before data collection. In addition, permission was obtained from aluminum company managers through an introductory letter issued by the Head of the Department of Medical Rehabilitation (Physiotherapy) at the University of Maiduguri. Before data collection, all participants provided informed consent.

Data collection tool

The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), a validated and widely used tool in WMSD research, was utilized for data collection. The NMQ has been successfully applied in previous studies in Nigeria, demonstrating high validity, with reported sensitivity ranging from 82.3 to 100% and specificity between 51.1% and 82.4%.[10] Participants received guidance on completing the questionnaire when necessary. For individuals unable to read or write in English, a professionally translated Hausa version of the questionnaire was provided, along with assistance where required.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentages, were used to summarize participants’ demographic information and risk factors associated with WMSDs. Chi-square tests were performed to evaluate relationships between WMSDs and sociodemographic characteristics, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.

RESULTS

A total of 276 NMQs were distributed and fully completed, yielding a 100% response rate. Sociodemographic analysis showed that all respondents were male (100%). The highest proportion (31.9%) of participants were aged between 26 and 35 years (n = 88), while the smallest group (14.9%, n = 41) belonged to the 18–25 age category.

In terms of educational background, 88.4% (n = 244) of respondents had tertiary education, while a small percentage had only primary education (0.7%, n = 2) or no formal education (1.8%, n = 5). Regarding work experience, most participants (30.8%, n = 85) had been in the aluminum industry for 7–8 years.

Concerning working hours, the majority (52.2%, n = 144) reported working between 3 and 4 h/day, while 33.7% (n = 93) worked 7–8 h daily. The sociodemographic characteristics are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents.
Item Frequency Percentage
Gender
  Male 276 100.0
Age (years)
  26–35 88 31.9
  36–45 84 30.4
  46 and above 63 22.8
  18–25 41 14.9
Educational level
  None 5 1.8
  Primary 2 0.7
  Secondary 25 9.1
  Tertiary (Diploma) 244 88.4
Years of work experience
  1–2 years 19 6.9
  3–4 years 63 22.8
  5–6 years 47 17.0
  7–8 years 85 30.8
  Above 8 years 62 22.5
Number of working hours/day
  0–2 h 14 5.1
  3–4 h 144 52.2
  5–6 h 12 4.3
  7–8 h 93 33.7
  More than 8 h 13 4.7

Prevalence of WMSDs

The study found that 62.3% of participants reported musculoskeletal discomfort within the past year, while 43.7% experienced symptoms in the past 7 days. The neck was the most commonly affected area, with 127 workers (62.3%) reporting pain in the past year and 82 workers (43.7%) within the past 7 days.

The right shoulder was also highly impacted, with 72 respondents (43.1%) experiencing discomfort in the previous 12 months and 39 workers (27.7%) within the past week. In addition, the right elbow recorded the highest prevalence of discomfort, affecting 57 workers (38.0%) over the last year and 45 workers (31.7%) within the past week.

Similarly, pain in the right wrist/hand was reported by 63 workers (41.7%) over the past year, and 63 workers (42.3%) also reported symptoms in the past 7 days. These findings suggest that the right side of the body, particularly the shoulder, elbow, and wrist/hand, is the most commonly affected area among aluminum workers. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders across different body regions is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Body region 12 Months (n, %) 7 Days (n, %)
Neck 127 (62.3) 82 (43.7)
Shoulder
  Right 72 (43.1) 39 (27.7)
  Left 15 (9.0) 22 (15.6)
  Both 47 (28.1) 29 (20.6)
Elbow
  Right 57 (38.0) 45 (31.7)
  Left 19 (12.7) 18 (12.7)
  Both 32 (21.3) 17 (12.0)
Wrist/Hand
  Right 63 (41.7) 63 (42.3)
  Left 24 (15.9) 29 (19.5)
  Both 35 (23.2) 16 (10.7)
Upper Back 102 (59.0) 83 (50.0)
Lower Back 125 (71.0) 102 (56.7)
Hips/Thighs/Buttocks 77 (43.8) 72 (41.6)
Knees 100 (54.9) 98 (56.0)
Ankle/Feet 88 (48.4) 76 (43.9)

Coping strategies and perceived job-related risk factors

Workers employed various coping mechanisms to manage musculoskeletal discomfort. Approximately 48.6% (n = 134) reported occasionally seeking help from colleagues to complete tasks, while 56.5% (n = 156) frequently adjusted their posture while working. In addition, 49.7% (n = 137) took breaks to stretch, 48.6% (n = 134) selectively performed tasks that minimized discomfort, and 47.1% (n = 130) temporarily stopped working when symptoms worsened.

Regarding perceived occupational risk factors, 32.9% (n = 87) identified prolonged standing, bending, and static postures as major contributors to musculoskeletal disorders. 42.9% (n = 106) cited insufficient rest breaks as a moderate risk factor, while 27.9% (n = 73) attributed symptoms to repetitive lifting. In addition, 29.4% (n = 74) linked WMSDs to a lack of training on injury prevention.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study highlight the high prevalence of WMSDs among aluminum workers in Maiduguri, with 62.3% of workers reporting symptoms in the past year and 43.7% experiencing discomfort within the past 7 days. These findings are consistent with global research indicating that labor-intensive industries pose a significant risk for musculoskeletal disorders.[1,4] The lower back, neck, and right shoulder emerged as the most affected areas, aligning with previous studies that associate repetitive movements, prolonged standing, and awkward postures with musculoskeletal strain.[8]

The prevalence of WMSDs observed in this study mirrors findings in similar occupations. A study conducted among aluminum workers in Norway documented a comparable pattern, with the lower back, shoulders, and wrists identified as the most affected areas due to repetitive work and exposure to vibrations.[4] Likewise, research from Nigeria has reported high WMSD rates among industrial workers.

For example, Adegoke et al. (2008)[5] found a 58% prevalence among factory workers, while Adamu et al. (2011)[6] recorded 66.5% among factory workers in Kano, both attributing these figures to poor ergonomics and physically demanding tasks.

This study also supports the findings of Maduagwu et al. (2015),[9] who identified the lower back as the most commonly affected area among long-distance drivers in Nigeria, suggesting that extended sitting or standing, as observed in aluminum work, significantly contributes to lumbar strain. Similarly, Lee et al. (2018)[11] established a direct correlation between long working hours and WMSDs, emphasizing cumulative exposure to ergonomic risk factors as a major determinant of disorder prevalence.

Despite these similarities, some international studies report lower WMSD prevalence rates. For instance, Descatha et al. (2007)[10] found a 47% prevalence among metal workers in France, attributing the lower rate to greater ergonomic awareness and workplace modifications. This contrast underscores the critical role of ergonomic training and occupational safety policies in reducing the risk of WMSDs.

Although the prevalence reported in this study aligns with findings from other developing nations, it remains higher than reported figures in developed countries, where ergonomic interventions and workplace safety policies are more effectively enforced.[2] This disparity may stem from insufficient ergonomic education and weak enforcement of occupational health policies in developing regions.[3]

A key distinction between this study and others is the lack of significant associations between WMSDs and demographic factors such as age, education level, and work experience. Some studies[7,11] have identified a strong link between increasing age, prolonged work exposure, and WMSD risk. However, the variation in findings may be attributed to differences in research methodology, sample size, or specific working conditions in Maiduguri’s aluminum industry.

One notable limitation of this study is the reliance on self-reported data, which may be subject to recall bias. Previous studies[1,4] have suggested that objective ergonomic assessments, such as posture analysis and biomechanical evaluations, provide a more accurate representation of workplace risk exposure. Future research should incorporate observational assessments and longitudinal designs to establish causal relationships between work conditions and WMSDs.

A significant concern raised by this study is the low level of ergonomic awareness and workplace interventions among aluminum workers. While 56.5% of workers reported modifying their sitting or standing posture to alleviate discomfort, only a small proportion had received formal ergonomic training. This knowledge gap emphasizes the urgent need for targeted ergonomic interventions, including workplace modifications, regular rest breaks, and comprehensive training on proper posture and equipment handling. Similar recommendations have been proposed by Maduagwu et al. (2015) and Descatha et al. (2007),[9,10] both of whom stress the importance of workplace education programs in mitigating WMSDs.

Implementing policy-level interventions, such as mandatory occupational health and safety programs, is crucial in addressing WMSD risks. Countries with strong occupational health regulations, particularly in Scandinavia, report lower WMSD prevalence rates due to proactive ergonomic assessments and worker education initiatives.[8] Adopting similar policies in Nigeria could significantly reduce WMSDs in labor-intensive sectors like aluminum manufacturing.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the growing body of research on WMSDs in labor-intensive industries, highlighting a notable burden among aluminum workers in Maiduguri. The findings emphasize the urgent need for ergonomic interventions, occupational health policies, and increased awareness programs to mitigate the risk of WMSDs.

By prioritizing worker health and safety, organizations can enhance productivity while minimizing the economic and social consequences of musculoskeletal disorders. Implementing ergonomic training, workplace modifications, and regulatory interventions can significantly reduce WMSD prevalence, ensuring better occupational health outcomes for aluminum workers in Nigeria.

Recommendations:

Employers should implement ergonomic modifications, enhance workplace safety training, and regularly assess working conditions to minimize the risk of WMSDs. Future studies should emphasize objective ergonomic evaluations and long-term monitoring to develop sustainable interventions specifically designed for workers in developing countries.

Authors’ contributions:

MAD: Was responsible for drafting the introduction;IAA and MAK contributed to the remaining sections of the manuscript; ABS: Prepared the abstract and conclusion. All authors participated in the literature review and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethical approval:

The research/study is approved by the Research and Ethical Committee of the College of Medical Sciences, University of Maiduguri, number 14/01/08/005, dated 12th April 2021.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Use of surface electromyography to estimate neck muscle activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10:377-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14:13-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Ergonomics issues among sewing machine operators in the textile manufacturing industry in Botswana. Work. 2011;38:279-89.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among aluminium workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2000;50:414-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Nigerian physiotherapists. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:112.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among factory workers in Kano metropolis, Nigeria. Niger J Med Rehabil. 2011;16:1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Use of a prevention index to identify industries at high risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, back, and upper extremity in Washington state, 1990-1998. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41(3):149-69.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23:243-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Prevalence and pattern of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among long-distance drivers in Ibadan, Nigeria: A cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:215.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Validity of Nordic-style questionnaires in the surveillance of upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Scand Work Environ Health. 2007;33:58-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Association between long working hours and musculoskeletal symptoms among Korean workers. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2018;30:67.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections