Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Educational Forum
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Messages
Narrative Review
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Short Communications
Special Invited Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Educational Forum
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Messages
Narrative Review
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Short Communications
Special Invited Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Educational Forum
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Messages
Narrative Review
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Short Communications
Special Invited Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
7 (
2
); 154-161
doi:
10.25259/AUJMSR_97_2025

Perioperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous infusion of preservative-free xylocaine with ketamine or dexmedetomidine as a total opioid-free anesthesia technique

Department of Anaesthesia, NC Medical College and Hospital, Israna, Haryana, India.
Department of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Divya Jyoti, Department of Anaesthesia, NC Medical College and Hospital, Israna, Haryana, India. drdivyajyotiyadav45@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Singh G, Kumari N, Kadyan K, Jyoti D, Panditrao MM. Perioperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous infusion of preservative-free xylocaine with ketamine or dexmedetomidine as a total opioid-free anesthesia technique. Adesh Univ J Med Sci Res. 2025;7:154-61. doi: 10.25259/AUJMSR_97_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

In consequence of the global opioid misuse catastrophe, non-opioid analgesic-based anesthesia has been achieving popularity, as it can obtain the goals of amnesia, hypnosis, and stability of hemodynamics while avoiding opioid adverse effects. The objectives are to study intraoperative as well as postoperative analgesic efficacy, hemodynamic changes, side effects, and complications of the infusion of preservative-free xylocaine, with the infusion of ketamine or dexmedetomidine.

Material and Methods:

In this randomized study, a total of 60 patients were enrolled, 30 in each group belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists 1 and II, who were aged 18–70 years, both genders and patients undergoing non-cavitary surgeries requiring general anesthesia. Group I received intravenous infusion of xylocaine and ketamine, whereas group II had xylocaine and dexmedetomidine infusion as described below. Initial data were recorded using Stata version 14 software, and various statistical tests (Student’s t-test, Chi-squared test for quantitative variables) were performed.

Results:

Although no opioids were administered, intraoperatively, the patients in both groups remained absolutely stable hemodynamically, with no variations in any of the parameters. Ramsay sedation score (P = 0.031) was significantly higher at 8th h in group II. The analgesia produced by dexmedetomidine was far superior to that produced by ketamine (P-values ranging from 0.021 to 0.0005). There were no significant perioperative complications in both groups.

Conclusion:

Both the group drugs can provide as excellent adjuncts for multimodal analgesic regimen to diminish postoperative opioid consumption. Hence, both groups of drugs can be used as a total opioid-free anesthesia/opioid sparing technique. Dexmedetomidine was found to be better than ketamine in terms of post-operative analgesia.

Keywords

Comparison: Xylocaine
Dexmedetomidine
Ketamine
Intravenous infusions
Opioid-free anesthesia
Peri-operative analgesia

INTRODUCTION

Opioids have been essential components of balanced general anesthesia practice for several decades, enabling anesthesiologists to manage pain, induce sedation, and maintain hemodynamic stability during day surgeries through bolus doses or continuous infusions.[1] Even with so many advantages of opioids, they produce multiple undesirable side-effects and complications which anesthesiologists encounter in perioperative period such as sedation, vomiting, nausea, urinary retention, ileus, pruritus, confusion, delirium, respiratory distress, and increased morphine consumption, immunosuppression, hyperalgesia, addiction, and abuse.[2] It leads to undesirable delayed transfer from post-anesthesia care unit, prolonged hospital stay, increased cost of healthcare, and poor patient satisfaction.[3]

Opioid-free anesthesia/analgesia (OFA) is a multimodal technique that induces anesthesia without the use of perioperative opioids.[4]

Agents that are more commonly used for multimodal anesthesia include N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists such as ketamine, magnesium sulfate, centrally acting alpha 2 agonists- dexmedetomidine, clonidine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids mainly dexamethasone, and local anesthetics – preservative-free xylocaine used as intravenous infusion.[5,6] Therefore, there is a pressing need to study and evaluate some non-opioid pain medications as part of an OFA technique during elective surgeries, which is integral to an opioid reduction strategy.[7]

When Xylocaine is used as systemic infusion, it has various non-opioid analgesic properties such as analgesia, anti-hyperalgesia, and anti-inflammation.[8] It causes blockade of sodium channels and firing of peripheral neurons that are activated by nociceptive stimuli and also inhibits NMDA receptors. Various clinical trials have revealed that infusion of perioperative xylocaine causes a reduction of pain intensity and opioid consumption in the post-surgical period.[9]

Ketamine prevents postoperative hyperalgesia, and its analgesic effects are mediated at the spinal level. It is characterized by potent analgesic, amnesic, and opioid-free properties. In subclinical doses (doses <0.5 mg/kg), it has good analgesic effects with minimal side effects.[10,11]

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective and specific alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist with analgesic, sedative, anxiolytic, and sympatholytic properties.[12] Dexmedetomidine is a centrally acting alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist with a good potential for improving analgesia, hemodynamic stability in responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. The investigations into the study on dexmedetomidine have shown early recovery after elective surgery, so it is becoming an area of interest in anesthesia practice.[13]

Hence, this randomized controlled trial was initiated to assess the analgesic requirements postoperatively in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries with preservative-free intravenous infusion of xylocaine and ketamine or dexmedetomidine as a total opioid-free analgesia/anesthesia technique Our hypothesis was that opioid-free anesthesia provided stable hemodynamics, less sedation, and adequate postoperative analgesia and reduced side effects significantly in elective surgeries. The aim of our study was to study the efficacy of infusion of preservative-free xylocaine with ketamine or dexmedetomidine given systemically for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, and the objectives were to study hemodynamic changes, side effects, and complications of infusion of preservative-free xylocaine, with infusion of ketamine or dexmedetomidine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, 2 parallel groups clinical trial was conducted at a single tertiary care center. This study was randomized by a computer-generated method. In our study, double-blinding infusion preparation and assessment of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Ramsay Sedation score (RSS) were done by an unbiased anesthesiologist not involved in the study, whereas all patients, staff, and involved anesthesiologists were blinded in the whole study. The randomization key was revealed when the study was completed, and then, data were computed.

Ethics and Controlled Trial Registry of India (CTRI)

After obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics committee (ref. no. IEC/approval/2023/70) and written informed consent from each patient, the study was registered in the CTRI (CTRI/2023/08/056658) before the enrollment of patients.

Inclusion criteria

(i) Selection of patients, aged within 18–70 years; (ii) both genders; (iii) American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I, II undergoing non-cavitary surgeries (modified radical mastectomy, fibroadenoma, lipomas, neurofibromas, parotidectomy, total thyroidectomy, fracture clavicle, fracture humerus) requiring general anesthesia with expected/anticipated duration of 1–1.5 h.

Exclusion criteria

(i) Non-consenting patients, (ii) patients <18, >70 years, (iii) patients with a history of allergy to any of the study drugs, (iv) prolonged duration surgeries (>1.5 h), (v) body mass index >35kg/m2, (vi) history of psychiatric illness and chronic pain, (vii) perioperative anesthetic complications, (viii) loss of follow-up.

In our study, the total number of patients enrolled was 80. The patients were allocated randomly to either of the two groups of 30 each (group I and group II), with the help of computer-generated random number. Figure 1 shows a consort diagram showing enrolment of patients.

Consort diagram. ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologist.
Figure 1:
Consort diagram. ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologist.

Groups I: Intravenous infusion of preservative-free xylocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h over 15 min before tracheal intubation and then 0.5 mg/kg/h or titrated as required till the closure of the wound and intravenous infusion of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg over 15 min before tracheal intubation and continued at rate of 0.25 mg/kg/h till 10 min before the closure of wound. Group II: Intravenous infusion of preservative-free xylocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h over 15 min before tracheal intubation and then 0.5 mg/kg/h or titrated as required till the closure of wound and intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg over 15 min before tracheal intubation and continued at rate of 0.2 mcg/kg/h till 10 min before the closure of wound. Table 1 shows the protocol of drug infusion of xylocaine, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine.

Table 1: Table showing group drugs infusion protocol.
Group Drugs Start (15 mins before induction) Intubation Maintenance (Post intubation) Stoppage of infusion
I Xylocaine 1.5 mg/kg Standard GA techniques, except opioids 0.5 mg/kg/hr. Skin closure
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg 0.25 mg/kg/hr. 10 mins before wound closure
II Xylocaine 1.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg/hr. Skin closure
Dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg 0.2 mcg/kg/hr. 10 mins before wound closure

GA: General anaesthesia

Anesthesia protocol

All the patients were assessed preoperatively in the routine preanesthetic checkup graded as ASA I-II, and informed consent was taken from all patients. In addition, we sensitized and trained all the patients to assess the VAS. All patients were planned for a standard pre-operative general anesthesia protocol of nil per oral for 8 h. Each participant entered the operating room, and routine monitoring including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2), electrocardiogram (ECG), and heart rate (HR) was established. The unbiased anesthesiologists not involved in the study prepared all the infusion drugs. No additional analgesics including opioids, injection paracetamol, or tramadol were given perioperatively. On the operation table, injection glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, injection midazolam 1 mg, and injection ondansetron 4 mg were administered intravenously before induction. After preoxygenation, anesthesia was induced with the injection of propofol (1.5–2 mg/kg) in titrated dose until the loss of response to verbal command. Subsequently, injection of atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) was given, followed by tracheal intubation with an adequately sized endotracheal tube. Maintenance of anaesthesia with a mixture of oxygen, nitrous oxide (40–60%) with isoflurane at minimum alveolar concentration of 0.2–1.5% and neuromuscular blockade with atracurium. Hemodynamic parameters such as SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and SPO2 were monitored and stabilized at regular intervals. Both study group infusion drugs were started 15 min before induction of anesthesia, and xylocaine continued till the closure of wound, while ketamine and dexmedetomidine continued till 10 min before closure of the wound. Intraoperative vitals, including SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and SPO2, were monitored continuously and recorded at 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min, and 150-min interval throughout the surgery. Patients were assessed for sedation through RSS and pain through VAS by the same anesthesiologist. Complications such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, arrhythmias, respiratory depression, and hallucinations were noted for 24 h. All these were documented postoperatively in results in tabulated form. In our study, we noted the need for post-operative rescue analgesia and its frequency. Injection ketorolac 30 mg given in 100 mL normal saline over 20-30 min when the VAS score was equal to or more than 3.

Sample size

Our sample size was based on changes in hemodynamic parameters among groups . Mean difference in MAP of 5.1. mm Hg with 8.1 mm Hg as standard deviation (SD). We have calculated sample size with 95% confidence interval, alpha error of 5%, and power of 80%, assuming the effect size (with outcome variable being mean blood pressure [BP]) to be 3. Each group required at least 30 patients to identify a significant effect on the hemodynamic parameters. Initial data were recorded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed with Stata version 14 software (Stata Corp LLC, TX, USA). Data were presented as mean ± SD for parametric data. The quantitative data were evaluated using unpaired Student’s t-test for significance, while categorical data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test. Variables with statistical significance in univariate analysis were employed to perform multivariate regression analysis. The adjusted p-value was also presented to take into account any confounding factors. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were evaluated for eligibility. After exclusion of unsuitable patients, the remaining 66 participants who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized into two groups. Final total patient number was 60 [Figure 1].

Demographic data

Table 2 shows the demographic variables. Apparently, there were statistically insignificant differences in the demographic parameters between the two groups.

Table 2: Demographic data and surgical duration presented as mean±standard deviation.
Variables Group 1 (n=30) (mean±SD) Group II (n=30) (mean±SD)
Age (years) 43.1±13.8 45.4±15.9
Gender M: F (13:17) M: F=12:18
Weight (kg) 55.5±8.52 53.3±8.93
ASA (I: II) 14:16 13:17
Duration of surgery (minutes) 64.0±20.9 67.6±21.1

M: Male, F: Female, ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologists, SD: Standard deviation

Table 3 shows the various surgical procedures performed on the patients in both the groups. It is obvious that the selected surgical procedures between the two groups were generally similar. It is also to be noted that all the procedures in both the groups were peripheral, superficial, and non-body cavitary surgical procedures.

Table 3: The various surgical procedures performed on the patients in both the groups.
Type of surgery Group I (number of patients) Group II (number of patients)
Fracture humerus 6 4
Fibroadenoma 3 5
Parotidectomy 2 1
Thyroidectomy 3 2
Lipoma 6 8
Mastectomy 3 2
Fracture clavicle 5 4
Neurofibroma 2 4

Hemodynamic data of study population

As is evident in Table 4, although no opioids were administered, intraoperatively the patients in both groups remained absolutely stable hemodynamically, with no variations in any of the parameters. One can safely conclude that, with both the combinations of intravenous infusions of “opioid-free anesthesia,” adequate intra-operative analgesia was produced, which was evident by stable intra-operative hemodynamics, with no autonomic disturbances. There was no significant difference between the groups in hemodynamic data (SBP, DBP, MAP, and heart rate) during intraoperative period, suggesting that although both ketamine and dexmedetomidine are very potent vasoactive drugs, co-administration of cardio-stable local anesthetic, xylocaine balances these potentially disturbing events.

Table 4: Intraoperative hemodynamic data of study population. Data were presented as mean±standard deviation.
Parameter Group I (mean±SD) Group II (mean±SD) P-value
HR (beats/min) 77.06±3.9 75.5±3.8 0.670
SBP (mmHg) 120.06±7.4 118.4±9.8 0.498
DBP (mmHg) 72.16±6.8 73.93±9.3 0.555
MAP (mmHg) 88.12±5.2 88.75±8.8 0.526

HR: Heart rate, SBP: Systolic blood pressure, DBP: Diastolic blood pressure, MAP: Mean arterial pressure, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Postoperative sedation

As shown in Table 5, although both the groups reported good sedation, the difference between both groups was statistically insignificant during the first 4 h, but dexmedetomidine had more sedative properties at 8th h, which was statistically significant.

Table 5: Postoperative RSS in both groups. Data were presented as mean±standard deviation. Dexmedetomidine causes more sedation at 8th h (P=0.031).
RSS Group I (mean±SD) Group II (mean±SD) P-value
0 h (immediately postoperatively) 3.857±1.10 4.33±0.91 0.136
1 h 3.23±0.71 3.42±0.67 0.375
4 h 2.66±0.48 2.85±0.35 0.154
8 h 2.13±0.52 2.75±0.46 0.031
12 h 1.10±0.35 1.21±0.41 0.387
24 h 1.05±0.22 1.15±0.37 0.334

RSS: Ramsay sedation score, SD: Standard deviation

In both the groups, the sedation scores were reported to be gradually decreasing with successive time points. Just after the surgery, patients showed just adequate sedation, which gradually wore off. By 8–12 h, patients were completely arousable, with minimal residual sedation.

In addition, in both groups, there were insignificant differences in sedation during post-operative period. However, patients receiving dexmedetomidine had significantly higher sedation scores as compared to those receiving ketamine.

Postoperative analgesia

Considering post-operative analgesia, which was the main aim of the study [Table 6], it is very clearly evident that when the actual quantity of VAS is taken into consideration till 8 h’ time-point, the patients had VAS of <3 to just about 3 in both the groups, suggesting excellent to adequate post-operative analgesia being achieved in timewise manner, after which as and when required the rescue analgesia would be given.

Table 6: Postoperative VAS scoring in both groups. Data were presented as mean±standard deviation. Group II had a significantly lower mean VAS score (P<0.5) post-operatively.
VAS Group I (mean±SD) Group II (mean±SD) P-value
0 h (immediately postoperatively) 0.94±0.75 0.52±0.51 0.042
1 h 1.24±0.52 0.66±0.66 0.001
4 h 1.92±0.76 1.38±0.74 0.011
8 h 3.60±1.32 1.95±1.91 0.011
12 h 4.84±1.32 3.82±0.84 0.0005
24 h 5.42±1.67 4.6±1.66 0.021

VAS: Visual Analog Score, SD: Standard deviation

One striking point observed was, at all time-points in the post-operative period, the analgesia produced by dexmedetomidine was far superior than that produced by Ketamine (P-values ranging from 0.021 to 0.0005).

There were significant differences in pain score during postoperative period in both the groups. Dexmedetomidine group shows better analgesic effect than ketamine postoperatively.

Post-operative complications

There were no significant complications during the perioperative period in both groups as mentioned in Table 7.

Table 7: Perioperative complications in both groups.
Parameters Group I (n=30) Group II (n=30)
Hypotension (decrease in BP 20%) 0 0
tachycardia (HR>100 bpm) 1 0
Bradycardia (decrease in HR 20%) 0 2
Nausea/Vomiting 1 0
Respiratory Depression 0 0
Arrythmias 0 0
Hallucinations 0 0
Rescue analgesia 2 0

No significant complications during perioperative period in both groups.

DISCUSSION

The indiscriminate use of opioids has resulted in a global prescription-precipitated opioid abuse epidemic. As a result of this major crisis, there has been a paradigm shift in the way the intraoperative and postoperative analgesia should be managed. More and more impetus is being provided to the concept of “opioid-free anaesthesia/opioid sparing strategy” (OFA/OSS). This study was one such an attempt.

This study was conducted with the main aim of finding a suitable technique of OFA out of the 2 easily available drugs and comparing them. The study demonstrated that administration of pre-incisional and intraoperative intravenous infusion of preservative-free xylocaine and ketamine (group I) and preservative-free xylocaine and dexmedetomidine (group II) improved post-operative analgesia by completely avoiding total opioid consumption over a 24-h period and decreased pain scores in patients undergoing procedures under general anesthesia.

Some of the adverse effects such as delayed wound healing, deep vein thrombosis, respiratory problems, poor rehabilitation, hyperglycemia, prolonged hospital stays, and development of chronic pain may occur with inadequate post-operative analgesia.[14] Reduced intraoperative analgesic requirement is due to the fact that when administered systemically, xylocaine has analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic, and anti-inflammatory properties which are effective in post-surgical period even after stopping the infusion at the end of surgery. Hence, during surgeries, xylocaine infusion can be given systemically as an adjunct in multimodal analgesia regimen, which is being used widely. Xylocaine and ketamine have a potential for altering central sensitization by modification of neurochemistry in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.[15]

Our study shows that preincisional and intraoperative infusion of xylocaine and dexmedetomidine is more effective as postoperative analgesia as compared to preservative-free xylocaine and ketamine, although both produced satisfactory analgesia. The key findings of our analysis revealed that the group II (xylocaine and dexmedetomidine) showed a lower mean VAS score (P < 0.5) than group I (xylocaine and ketamine) in post-surgical period at 0 h (immediately postoperative), 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12-h, 24 h as described in Table 6.

Dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and lidocaine have an analgesic effect without causing significant respiratory depression and having post-operative opioid sparing effect, thereby reducing the risk of opioid related postoperative complications.[16]

There was no significant difference between the groups in hemodynamic data, SBP, DBP, MAP, and heart rate. In group 1, SBP and DBP were 120.06±7.4 and 72.16±6.8, respectively, and in group II, SBP and DBP were 118.4 ± 9.8.and 73.93 ± 9.3, respectively. Heart rate in group 1 and group II was 77.06 ± 3.9 and 75.5 ± 3.8 g, respectively. Our study results were comparable to Bekker et al., who found that dexmedetomidine, given at a similar dosage, effectively reduced the increase in SBP during the perioperative phase, without raising the incidence of bradycardia or hypotension.[17] Hemodynamics changes with the effect of dexmedetomidine can be illustrated by its activation of presynaptic a2-receptors, which strengthens the negative feedback inhibition of noradrenaline release from the peripheral nerve terminal along with its inhibitory effect on central sympathetic outflow due to a2-receptor stimulation in the locus coeruleus of brainstem.[18] Hogue et al. published that dexmedetomidine maintains baroreflex sensitivity, allowing patients to maintain a normal heart rate response to BP changes. The noted decline in the heart rate is primarily attributed to sympathetic withdrawal rather than enhanced vagal activity.[19] Dexmedetomidine uniquely provides sedation devoid of respiratory depression, featuring a wide safety margin and an excellent sedative capacity.[20] It does not heighten the frequency of post-operative complications. Our study was consistent with the systematic review conducted by Salomé et al.[21] who noted less sedation in the OFA groups than in opioid-based groups in the post-anesthesia care unit. In addition, both groups had a better recovery profile, lower sedation score, and no significant complications.

Perioperative xylocaine infusion reduced significantly postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV). In our study, there was no significant post-operative nausea and vomiting but in group 1, only one case shows PONV as described in Table 7. This is in accordance with the meta-analysis conducted by Vigneault et al.[22] Perioperatively, ketamine was effective in reducing the incidence of PONV in subanesthetic doses. Numerous studies verified our data showing a noteworthy reduction in PONV with ketamine infusion.[23,24]

Both ketamine with xylocaine[25] and dexmedetomidine with xylocaine[26] show synergistic effect in sedation as well as in analgesia, this was also observed by authors while performing a colon procedure.

Second, the elimination half-life of dexmedetomidine is approximately 2 h,[27] half-life of xylocaine is 86 min,[28] whereas, of ketamine is 2.5 h,[29] and pharmacologically, majority of these drugs are eliminated after 4–6 half-lives when the effects of discontinuation become evident.

Both these properties of synergism and elimination half-life can lead to prolongation of sedation and analgesic duration up to 24 h as observed in our study. While comparing dexmedetomidine and ketamine, we found dexmedetomidine to be more sedative than ketamine up to 12 h, as also observed by Sivakumar et al.[30]

Limitations of the study

Although we have been successful in confirming our alternate hypothesis (refuting the null hypothesis) in proving the suitability of either of the techniques as an adequate alternative to opioid-based general anesthesia, there are some limitations which must be mentioned.

This is a single-center study, carried out in patients undergoing very specific set of body surface surgical procedures, not involving any body cavities. The results might differ during the conduct of such surgical procedures. More studies involving such procedures or invasive procedures may be needed to be conducted for better understanding.

The sample size of 60 may be a comparatively smaller sample. Some large sample size studies may be needed.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative xylocaine and ketamine or dexmedetomidine infusion reduces pain intensity and better hemodynamic stability without any opioid related adverse effects for patients undergoing superficial non-cavitary surgeries under general anesthesia. Consequently, we suggest that any of two group drug combinations can provide as satisfactory adjuncts for multimodal analgesic regimen to lessen postoperative opioid usage. Hence, both groups of drugs can be used as total opioid-free anesthesia/opioid sparing technique. Dexmedetomidine was found better than Ketamine in view of postoperative analgesia. Further studies should be done to particularize the dose and duration of xylocaine, dexmedetomidine, or ketamine in other types of surgeries under general anesthesia. Hence, we conclude that the OFA technique using preincisional and intraoperative intravenous infusion of xylocaine as the foundation with adjuvant like ketamine or dexmedetomidine is effective in providing clinically satisfactory perioperative analgesia to the patients undergoing general anesthesia, especially the surface, non-body cavity surgical procedures. Out of the 2 study drugs, namely ketamine and dexmedetomidine, there does not seem to be any significant difference between them in providing adequate intraoperative analgesia as well as maintaining intraoperative hemodynamic stability. However, postoperatively, dexmedetomidine seems to be better in providing superior analgesia. Both drugs produce time-dependent sedation, which is just adequate to maintain the comfort of the patient, without compromising the safety.

Acknowledgment:

We are heartfully thankful to Dr. Sunil Kumar (PG YIII) for conducting this study as a non-biased assessor.

Ethical approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at NC Medical College and Hospital, number ref. no. IEC/approval/2023/70, dated 27th July 2023.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

Dr. Mridul Madhav Panditrao is on the Editorial Board of the Journal.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , . Opioids, respiratory depression, and sleep-disordered breathing. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;31:469-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . The effect of opioid-free anesthesia on the quality of recovery after gynecological laparoscopy: Study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22:207.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Opioid-free anesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019;33:353-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . An evidence-based opioid-free anesthetic technique to manage perioperative and periprocedural pain. Ochsner J. 2018;18:121-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine reduces perioperative analgesic requirements. Can J Anesth. 2006;53:646-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Intraoperative esmolol infusion in the absence of opioids spares postoperative fentanyl in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1255-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Reducing the oversupply of prescription opioids. NC Med J. 2018;79:175-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine on pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2018;50:137-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . Mechanisms of (local) anaesthetics on voltage-gated sodium and other ion channels. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:52-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Perioperative intravenous ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD012033.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . A qualitative systematic review of the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in preventive analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1385-400.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in humans. I. Sedation, ventilation, and metabolic rate. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:1125-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . The analgesic potency of dexmedetomidine is enhanced after nerve injury: A possible role for peripheral alpha2-adrenoceptors. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:941-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:62-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD009642.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Effectiveness and safety of intravenous application of dexmedetomidine for cesarean section under general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:965-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. The effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1340-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:893-913.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Autonomic nervous system responses during sedative infusions of dexmedetomidine. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:592-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . The use of dexmedetomidine in anesthesia and intensive care: A review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:6257-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Opioid-free anesthesia benefit-risk balance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2069.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:22-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Ketamine as adjuvant analgesic to opioids: A quantitative and qualitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:482-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Ketamine and postoperative pain--a quantitative systematic review of randomised trials. Pain. 2005;113:61-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. . Lidocaine and dexmedetomidine combined infusion as an alternative to propofol for sedation in colonoscopy. Ain Shams J Anesthesiol. 2021;13:42.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . The effect of intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, and lidocaine-ketamine combination in colorectal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2025;140:67-76.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Discontinuation of prolonged infusions of dexmedetomidine in critically ill children with heart disease. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:300-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , . Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971;12:105-16.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . Pharmacokinetics of ketamine in man. Anaesthesist. 1975;24:260-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , . Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fiberoptic nasal intubation in patients with difficult airway-A randomized, double-blinded, comparative trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025;41:496-502.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections