Translate this page into:
Perinatal anxiety in mothers of neonatal intensive care unit-admitted neonates: A case–control study on prevalence and associated factors
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Singh H, Gupta R, Brar GK. Perinatal anxiety in mothers of neonatal intensive care unit-admitted neonates: A case–control study on prevalence and associated factors. Adesh Univ J Med Sci Res. doi: 10.25259/AUJMSR_41_2025
Abstract
Objectives:
The objective is to study the prevalence of anxiety and its associated factors in mothers of neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), through case–control study in a tertiary care hospital, Punjab. The focus was exclusively on maternal perinatal anxiety, given the unique stresses of the NICU environment.
Material and Methods:
In this hospital-based cross-sectional case–control study, 160 mothers of preterm and/or low birth weight neonates in the NICU were compared to 160 mothers of healthy full-term neonates (controls). Participants (ages 18–45) were assessed using the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS) for anxiety. Key sociodemographic and clinical variables (age, education, socio-economic status, etc.) were recorded. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests (or Fisher’s exact test) for categorical comparisons with significance at P < 0.05. All mothers were interviewed between 3 and 7-day postpartum while still admitted (inpatient department) in the obstetric ward (controls) or NICU (cases). In addition, participants were screened for depressive symptoms using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and mothers scoring ≥10 were excluded to avoid inclusion of postpartum depression or blues.
Results:
Mothers of NICU-admitted babies (cases) showed a statistically significant difference in prevalence of perinatal anxiety (PASS score ≥21) than mothers of healthy newborn babies (control) (92.5% vs. 70.6%, P < 0.001). Maternal age under 25 years, cesarean delivery, and having a female neonate were each significantly associated with heightened anxiety levels in NICU mothers (all P < 0.05). No significant differences in anxiety were found with respect to maternal education, occupation of the mother, socio-economic status, domicile, family structure, pregnancy planning, or previous history of abortion.
Conclusion:
Nearly all mothers with NICU-admitted neonates experienced clinically significant anxiety. Younger maternal age, cesarean birth, and a female newborn emerged as greater risk factors. These findings underscore the need for routine anxiety screening and tailored psychosocial support for mothers in the NICU setting to mitigate anxiety and improve outcomes for both mother and neonate.
Keywords
Anxiety in mothers
Neonatal intensive care unit
Neonates
Perinatal anxiety
Perinatal anxiety screening scale
INTRODUCTION
Perinatal anxiety refers to the onset of clinically significant anxiety symptoms in mothers during the immediate period following childbirth, often within the first few days to weeks postpartum. It is marked by excessive worry, restlessness, irritability, difficulty sleeping, and intrusive thoughts, frequently focused on the newborn’s health and safety.[1,2] Although it may occur alongside postpartum depression, postpartum anxiety is a distinct condition with unique clinical features that can impair maternal functioning and early mother-neonate bonding.[3]
The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission of babies creates multiple stressors that impact mothers emotionally, physically, and socially.[4,5] Uncertainties about the baby’s prognosis combined with the unfamiliar and technologically demanding environment of the NICU exacerbate feelings of fear and anxiety. The emotional turmoil caused by disrupted postpartum bonding and feelings of powerlessness leads to or intensifies anxiety symptoms.[6,7]
The NICU environment is a potent source of stress. Elevated maternal stress levels can be caused by the continuous sound of alarms, the sight of complex medical equipment, and the experience of sporadic, frequently limited parental contact with the baby. In many instances, mothers report feeling alienated from the caregiving process, which not only intensifies anxiety but also hampers the creation of a strong bond with their baby.[7,8]
As the literature suggests, early identification of distress in NICU mothers can facilitate timely interventions that improve not only maternal well-being but also promote more positive outcomes for the neonate. A more thorough investigation of the ways in which stress, depression, and anxiety interact and affect maternal functioning as well as neonate development will be made possible by the integration of several methodological approaches.[6,7]
Research on stress evaluation and anxiety in NICU-admitted newborn mothers remains crucial because of its significant clinical and developmental and policy implications. By synthesizing findings from a wide array of published studies, this study endeavors to clarify the prevalence and determinants of maternal distress in the NICU, while also evaluating the tools and interventions currently available to support affected mothers. This research will generate enhanced knowledge about maternal mental health within NICUs which will guide future intervention strategies to improve maternal and neonate outcomes.[4,5]
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This hospital-based, cross-sectional case–control study was conducted from May 2024 to April 2025 in the NICU and obstetrics wards of a tertiary care hospital in Punjab, India. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and all participating mothers provided written informed consent. The case group included 160 consecutive mothers (aged 18–45 years) of preterm (<37-week gestation) or low-birth-weight (<2.5 kg) neonates admitted to the NICU. The control group comprised 160 mothers of healthy full-term neonates (≥37 weeks and ≥2.5 kg) in the obstetric ward. All mothers were interviewed between 3 and 7 days postpartum while still admitted (inpatient department) in the obstetric ward (controls) or NICU (cases). Cases and controls matched on maternal age (±2 years) and socioeconomic status (assessed by occupation and income level). Exclusion criteria for both groups included a history of major psychiatric illness, significant obstetric complications, or refusal to participate. Mothers in both groups were majority married homemakers from similar demographic backgrounds. Mothers were allowed limited NICU access (two visits per day of 30 min each) under strict infection control measures including hand hygiene, gowning, and masking.
Measures
A semi-structured, author-designed proforma was used to collect sociodemographic and obstetric information, including maternal age, education, occupation, socioeconomic status, domicile, family structure, parity, pregnancy planning status, sex of the baby, previous history of abortion, and mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean) [Supplementary Material]. Maternal anxiety was assessed with the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS).[9] The PASS scale is a 31-item self-report inventory which measures anxiety symptoms relevant to pregnancy and the postpartum period. A cutoff score of 21 or higher is recommended to indicate clinically significant anxiety. In this study, the PASS was administered by a trained interviewer in a private setting to ensure comprehension and confidentiality.[9] To address potential gender-related bias, both groups were matched for sex of the baby, and mothers’ attitude toward the baby’s sex was recorded as a variable.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Continuous variables (e.g., maternal age, PASS scores) were summarized with means (standard deviations); various variables (e.g., education level, mode of delivery, etc.) were summarized with frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons for categorical variables used chi-square tests. All tests were two-tailed with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Participant characteristics
A total of 320 mothers participated (160 NICU mothers and 160 controls). The mean age of the NICU mother group was 23.2 ± 2.7 years, with ages ranging from 18 to 30. Two-thirds (66%) of the NICU mothers were in the 18–24-year age range, reflecting the predominance of young mothers in this setting. The control group had a similar age distribution by study design (mean age 23.4 ± 2.2 years, not significantly different). The majority of participants in both groups were from lower or middle socio-economic strata (by inclusion, matched on socio-economic status).
In terms of education, about 16% of NICU mothers had only primary schooling, 72% had completed secondary school, and 12% were graduates or had higher education. This educational profile was roughly mirrored in the control group. Most mothers in both groups were homemakers (approximately 90%), with only 10% mothers employed. Around 2/3 (65%) of the NICU group resided in rural areas and 1/3 (35%) in urban areas, which was also comparable to the control group. A slight majority of mothers (58%) were from joint families (living in extended family households) as opposed to nuclear families.
Obstetric and clinical characteristics were notable for a high rate of cesarean section deliveries in the NICU group. Fully 134 out of 160 NICU mothers (83.8%) had delivered through cesarean section, often emergently due to fetal distress or complications of prematurity, whereas the remaining 16.2% had normal vaginal deliveries. In the control group, 68 mothers (42.5%) underwent cesarean delivery and 57.5% had vaginal births, a difference reflecting clinical indications (many NICU admissions followed complicated deliveries). In addition, 32.5% of NICU mothers reported that the pregnancy was unplanned, while 67.5% had planned pregnancies, similar to controls (approximately one-third unplanned). Nearly one-third (30.6%) of NICU mothers had experienced a previous pregnancy loss (miscarriage or stillbirth), compared to approximately 25% of control mothers; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Importantly, none of the participants had a pre-existing anxiety or depressive disorder diagnosis, per exclusion criteria, though baseline mental health history beyond that was not extensively characterized [Table 1]. Common indications for cesarean section included fetal distress, preterm labor, and meconium-stained liquor.
| Sociodemographic/clinical variable | Cases | Controls | Chi-square test value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Age (in years) | ||||
| 18-24 | 106 (66.25) | 117 (73.12) | 1.4794 | 0.2239 |
| 25-30 | 54 (33.75) | 43 (26.87) | NS | |
| Religion | ||||
| Hindu | 49 (30.62) | 41 (25.62) | 0.7575 | 0.3841 |
| Sikh | 111 (69.37) | 119 (74.37) | NS | |
| Education | ||||
| Primary | 26 (16.25) | 36 (22.5) | 2.0123 | 0.365 |
| Secondary | 115 (71.87) | 107 (66.87) | NS | |
| >Graduate | 19 (11.87) | 17 (10.62) | ||
| Domicile | ||||
| Rural | 104 (65) | 97 (60.62) | 0.4816 | 0.4877 |
| Urban | 56 (35) | 63 (39.37) | NS | |
| Family type | ||||
| Nuclear | 67 (41.87) | 62 (38.75) | 0.2078 | 0.6485 |
| Joint | 93 (58.12) | 98 (61.25) | NS | |
| Socioeconomic status | ||||
| Lower | 69 (43.12) | 54 (33.75) | 2.5884 | 0.1076 |
| Middle | 91 (56.87) | 106 (66.25) | NS | |
| Occupation | ||||
| Homemaker | 144(90) | 149 (93.125) | 2.5832 | 0.108 |
| Employed | 16(10) | 11 (6.875) | NS | |
| Marital relationship | ||||
| Cordial | 149 (93.12) | 154 (96.25) | 0.994 | 0.319 |
| Discordial | 11 (6.87) | 6(3.75) | NS | |
| Domestic violence | ||||
| Present | 16(10) | 3 (1.875) | 8.057 | 0.00453 |
| Absent | 144 (90) | 157 (98.125) | S | |
| Pregnancy planning status | ||||
| Unplanned | 52 (32.5) | 40 (25) | 1.846 | 0.174 |
| Planned | 108 (67.5) | 120 (75) | NS | |
| Previous history of abortion | ||||
| Present | 49 (30.62) | 61 (38.12) | 0.194 | 0.66 |
| Absent | 91 (56.87) | 99 (61.87) | NS | |
| Gender of the child | ||||
| Male | 88 (55) | 87 (54.37) | 0 | 1 |
| Female | 72 (45) | 73 (45.62) | NS | |
| Mode of delivery | ||||
| Normal vaginal delivery | 26 (16.25) | 92 (57.5) | 56.721 | <0.00001 |
| Cesarean | 134 (83.75) | 68 (42.5) | S |
S: Significant, NS: Non-significant
The neonates in the NICU group were predominantly premature (mean gestational age ~33 weeks) or low birth weight (mean weight ~1.9 kg), often requiring respiratory support or other intensive care. In the control group, all neonates were born at term and were generally healthy. Female neonates slightly outnumbered male neonates in both groups. In the NICU group, 88 mothers (55%) had delivered a female baby and 72 (45%) a male; the control group had an almost identical sex distribution (54% female). Median NICU length of stay for the neonate was around 10 days (range 3–40 days) – this contextual detail is provided as it might influence maternal stress, though not a direct variable in our analysis. The mean NICU stay was approximately 10 ± 6 days; most neonates required oxygen or IV fluids, eight required mechanical ventilation, and no neonatal deaths occurred during the study period.
Taken together, the case and control samples were well-matched on key background characteristics, minimizing confounding. The primary systematic differences were inherent to the study design: NICU mothers had neonates with serious medical needs, whereas control mothers did not. Any psychological differences observed can therefore be reasonably attributed to the NICU experience and related factors, rather than demographic differences.
Anxiety prevalence in NICU mothers versus controls
Mothers of NICU-admitted neonates had markedly elevated anxiety levels relative to mothers of healthy newborns. On the PASS, the mean total anxiety score in the NICU group was 38.9 (SD ≈ 7), compared to 30.1 (SD ≈ 8) in the control group – a substantial and significant difference (P < 0.001 by Mann–Whitney U-test; data not shown in tables). Using the threshold score of 21 to define “significant anxiety,” 148 out of 160 NICU mothers (92.5%) screened positive for clinically significant anxiety, in contrast to 113 out of 160 control mothers (70.6%). This difference was highly significant (χ2 test, P < 0.0001). In other words, nearly all mothers in the NICU group exhibited at least moderate anxiety symptoms, whereas about 30% of control mothers did not show elevated anxiety [Table 2 and Figure 1].
| Anxiety | Cases | Control | Chi-square test value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present | 148 | 113 | 24.02 | 9.52x10-7 |
| Absent | 12 | 47 | Significant |

- Graphical comparison of anxiety prevalence in cases and controls.
It is notable that even among control mothers of healthy neonates, the anxiety prevalence was not negligible at around 70%. This likely reflects that the immediate postpartum period can be anxiety-provoking in general (with concerns about newborn care, recovery from childbirth, etc.). However, the NICU mothers’ anxiety rates were significantly higher still. A majority of NICU mothers described feeling “extremely” or “very” anxious on multiple PASS items, particularly those related to acute worries about their baby’s health and feelings of panic or tension in the NICU setting.
Factors associated with maternal anxiety
We next examined whether certain maternal characteristics or aspects of the birth were associated with the heightened anxiety in NICU mothers. Given the uniformly high anxiety rates in the NICU group, differences emerged mainly in comparison to control mothers within specific strata:
Maternal age
From the study, it has been observed that anxiety symptoms affected 98 out of 106 in cases and in control group 79 out of 117 controls during the 18–24-year age period. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 19.62, P < 0.001). The study established a statistically meaningful link between youth age and anxiety assessment results for cases versus control groups within the age range of 18–24 years. In contrast, for women aged 25–30 years, anxiety prevalence was high in both groups and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). The interaction effect suggests that younger mothers were especially susceptible to the anxiety-provoking effects of NICU hospitalization [Table 3].
| Various variables | Anxiety | Cases | Controls | Chi-square test | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||||||
| 18-24 years | Present | 98 | 79 | 19.62 | 9.46E-06 | ||
| Absent | 8 | 38 | S | ||||
| 25-30 years | Present | 50 | 34 | 2.7 | 0.1 | ||
| Absent | 4 | 9 | NS | ||||
| Education | |||||||
| Primary | Present | 24 | 33 | 0.1453 | 0.7031 | ||
| Absent | 2 | 3 | NS | ||||
| Secondary | Present | 107 | 88 | 5.0836 | 0.24154 | ||
| Absent | 8 | 19 | NS | ||||
| Graduate | Present | 17 | 15 | 0.1707 | 0.1707 | ||
| Absent | 2 | 2 | NS | ||||
| Occupation | |||||||
| Homemaker | Present | 133 | 126 | 3.6135 | 0.0573 | ||
| Absent | 11 | 23 | NS | ||||
| Employed | Present | 15 | 10 | 0.2217 | 0.6377 | ||
| Absent | 1 | 1 | NS | ||||
| Domicile | |||||||
| Rural | Present | 96 | 85 | 0.7596 | 0.3834 | ||
| Absent | 8 | 12 | NS | ||||
| Urban | Present | 52 | 51 | 2.6599 | 0.1029 | ||
| Absent | 4 | 12 | NS | ||||
| Family type | |||||||
| Joint | Present | 87 | 82 | 3.6481 | 0.0561 | ||
| Absent | 6 | 16 | NS | ||||
| Nuclear | Present | 61 | 54 | 0.191 | 0.662 | ||
| Absent | 6 | 8 | NS | ||||
| Socioeconomic status | |||||||
| Lower | Present | 64 | 46 | 1.1224 | 0.2894 | ||
| Absent | 5 | 8 | NS | ||||
| Middle | Present | 84 | 90 | 1.9333 | 0.1643 | ||
| Absent | 7 | 16 | NS | ||||
| Pregnancy | |||||||
| Planned | Present | 97 | 98 | 2.426 | 0.119 | ||
| Absent | 11 | 22 | NS | ||||
| Unplanned | Present | 51 | 38 | 0.0537 | 0.816 | ||
| Absent | 1 | 2 | NS | ||||
| Previous history of abortion | |||||||
| Yes | Present | 44 | 51 | 0.1475 | 0.70089 | ||
| Absent | 6 | 10 | NS | ||||
| No | Present | 104 | 85 | 3.5953 | 5.70E-02 | ||
| Absent | 6 | 14 | NS | ||||
| Mode of delivery | |||||||
| Cesarean | Present | 125 | 56 | 4.671 | 0.0306 | ||
| Absent | 9 | 12 | S | ||||
| Normal vaginal delivery | Present | 23 | 80 | 0.0169 | 0.8965 | ||
| Absent | 3 | 12 | NS | ||||
| Gender of child | |||||||
| Male | Present | 63 | 60 | 0.4347 | 0.5096 | ||
| Absent | 9 | 13 | NS | ||||
| Female | Present | 85 | 76 | 3.891 | 0.0485 | ||
| Absent | 3 | 11 | S | ||||
S: Significant, NS: Non-significant
Education
From the study, it has been observed that 107 cases suffered from anxiety, while 88 controls suffered from anxiety who had completed secondary schooling. The difference was statistically significant. Statistics proved that cases who completed secondary education showed higher anxiety levels compared to controls. The research did not establish any connection between the anxiety levels of mothers who completed primary education or graduated. Our findings imply that educational attainment was not a distinguishing factor for anxiety in the NICU context – highly educated mothers were just as anxious as less educated mothers when their neonate was critically ill [Table 3].
Employment status
From the study, it has been observed that 133 cases suffered from anxiety, while 102 controls suffered from anxiety in homemakers. Among employed persons, 10 cases suffered from anxiety, while none of the controls suffered from anxiety. The difference was not statistically significant. The study could not establish a statistically important connection between the anxiety with both groups of occupation in cases as compared to controls. The Chi-square test evaluated differences between groups in cases. The occupation factor among cases failed to show any significant connection with anxiety [Table 3].
Therefore, being a working mother did not protect against nor predispose to anxiety in the NICU situation; the NICU stressor seemed to overwhelm occupational differences.
Place of residence
From the study, it has been observed that 96 cases suffered from anxiety while 85 controls suffered from anxiety who were residing in the rural area. 52 cases suffered from anxiety while 51 controls suffered from anxiety who were from urban area. The obtained statistical data failed to establish a significant difference between the groups. The research determined that anxiety levels between different domicile groups in cases and controls were unrelated at a statistically insignificant level. Chi-square test evaluated intergroup difference in case populations. The distribution of cases according to their domicile did not show a statistically meaningful relationship with anxiety levels [Table 3].
Thus, geographic domicile did not show an association with maternal anxiety in our study.
Family structure
From the study, it has been observed that 87 cases suffered from anxiety, while 82 controls suffered from anxiety who belonged to a joint family. 61 cases suffered from anxiety while 54 controls suffered from anxiety who belonged to a nuclear family. The difference was not statistically significant. No meaningful association was found between anxiety levels and family type in cases compared to controls in the study. The difference between the groups was evaluated by Chi-square test and indicated no significant relationship between anxiety and family type in case group [Table 3].
The data suggest that the presence of an extended family network did not significantly buffer against (or exacerbate) NICU-related anxiety in this cohort.
Socio-economic status
From the study, it has been observed that 64 cases suffered from anxiety, while 46 controls suffered from anxiety, who were hailing from lower socio-economic status and 84 cases suffered from anxiety while 90 controls suffered from anxiety, who were hailing from middle socioeconomic status. The difference was not statistically significant, indicating no meaningful association between anxiety levels and socioeconomic status (lower or middle) among cases compared to controls [Table 3]. It appears that the stress of having a critically ill neonate may cut across income lines, affecting mothers broadly regardless of economic resources.
Pregnancy planning
From the study, it has been observed that 51 cases suffered from anxiety, while 38 controls suffered from anxiety who had an unplanned pregnancy. 97 cases suffered from anxiety while 98 controls suffered from anxiety who had a planned pregnancy. The difference was statistically not significant. A Chi-square test was used to assess intergroup differences among the cases. The analysis showed no significant association between anxiety levels and pregnancy planning status within the case group [Table 3].
History of abortion
The study observed that 47 cases and 44 controls with a history of previous abortion experienced anxiety. Among those without a history of abortion, 85 cases and 58 controls reported anxiety. This difference was found to be statistically significant. The study found a significant association between anxiety and previous history of abortion when comparing cases to controls. A Chi-square test was used to assess intergroup differences within the case group; however, no significant association was observed between anxiety and previous abortion history among the cases themselves [Table 3].
Mode of delivery
From the study, it has been observed that 125 cases suffered from anxiety, while 56 controls suffered from anxiety who had a cesarean section. The difference was statistically significant, indicating a significant association between anxiety and cesarean section in cases compared to controls. However, no association was found between anxiety and normal vaginal delivery [Table 3].
Neonate’s sex
From the study, it has been observed that 85 cases suffered from anxiety while 76 controls suffered from anxiety who delivered a female child. The difference was statistically significant, indicating an association between anxiety and having a female child when comparing cases to controls. A Chi-square test was used to assess intergroup differences within the case group; however, no significant association was found between anxiety and the child’s gender among the cases themselves 0.0485. There is no any association between anxiety and having a male child [Table 3].
In summary, three factors – younger maternal age, cesarean delivery, and having a female neonate – showed significant associations with maternal anxiety in the context of NICU admission. These can be viewed as risk indicators for especially high anxiety (or a greater differential in anxiety compared to normative cases). On the other hand, many presumed factors (education, social support indicators like family type, socioeconomic status (SES), etc.) did not show measurable effects on anxiety levels in our sample. This underscores that NICU-related anxiety was pervasive across diverse backgrounds and that the NICU experience itself is the primary driver of maternal anxiety, with only a few modifiers of that effect. It is worth noting that because anxiety was nearly universal among NICU mothers, detecting predictors of the degree of anxiety was challenging - many of our analyses had limited variability to exploit. The significant factors identified might indicate subgroups of NICU mothers who could be in even greater need of psychological support (e.g., young 1st-time mothers with an unexpected surgical delivery of a baby girl).
DISCUSSION
This study found that mothers of neonates admitted to the NICU experienced substantially higher anxiety than mothers of healthy full-term neonates. This result aligns with a growing body of research identifying NICU hospitalization as a major stressor for parents. In one study, it was noted that NICU mothers have much higher rates of postpartum mood disturbances than community samples, and our findings extend this knowledge specifically to anxiety[10] similarly identified NICU hospitalization as a key stressor that disrupts maternal emotional well-being. Subsequent studies documented elevated stress and anxiety in NICU mothers, consistent with our results.[11,12] Indeed, one more study conducted a systematic review showing that NICU parents have high rates of both anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms, reinforcing that the NICU context places parents at high risk.[13] In short, the literature consistently portrays NICU parents as a high-risk group for psychological distress, and our data confirm that maternal anxiety is markedly elevated in this population.
The neonate’s condition can change rapidly, creating pervasive uncertainty. In addition, having a sick baby in the NICU often follows a traumatic or complicated delivery, which may include an emergency cesarean section or preterm labor. Such experiences can predispose mothers to anxiety. In our sample, younger maternal age and cesarean delivery were associated with higher anxiety levels, possibly reflecting less parenting experience and the additional physical recovery associated with surgery. These findings mirror observations in other settings that younger mothers and emergency C-sections tend to correlate with greater postpartum distress.
The observed association between having a female neonate and higher maternal anxiety is intriguing. Some research suggests parental expectations and cultural factors linked to neonate gender can influence parental stress, but evidence is limited. It is possible that mothers of female neonates in our sample perceived a different set of risks or had different expectations, but this finding should be interpreted cautiously.
Maternal anxiety in the NICU can also have important downstream effects. High anxiety may interfere with caregiving activities, such as breastfeeding or skin-to-skin contact, which rely on maternal confidence and relaxation. For example, mothers dealing with NICU stressors (like breastfeeding difficulties) had more anxiety and depressive symptoms.[14] Prolonged maternal anxiety has been linked to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm children.[15] In other words, when mothers are highly anxious, this can disrupt early bonding and may contribute to less optimal neonate development.
Our results have clear clinical implications. First, they underscore the importance of routine mental health screening for NICU mothers. Simple measures like administering the PASS at admission or periodically could identify mothers at risk. Second, NICU healthcare providers should be trained to recognize and address maternal distress. Third, referral systems should be in place so that mothers who score highly on anxiety screening can access counselling or psychosocial support. Although interventions were not directly tested, evidence-based programs such as the Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) and structured parental education has shown benefits and may be adapted locally.
The COPE program a structured psychological support intervention for NICU parents significantly reduced maternal anxiety and depression compared to usual care.[16] Mothers in the COPE group reported greater knowledge about neonate behavior and felt more in control. This suggests that relatively brief, focused programs can make a meaningful difference. Based on our findings, similar programs (potentially adapted for the local cultural context) could benefit mothers in this NICU.
Our study has several strengths. We used a case–control design with well-matched comparison mothers, which allowed us to isolate the impact of the NICU experience on anxiety while controlling for confounding demographic factors. The use of a validated, perinatal-specific anxiety measure (PASS) provided a focused assessment of maternal anxiety. The sample size was relatively large for a single-center study, and all participants were assessed by trained staff with high adherence to the protocol.
However, limitations must be noted. This was a cross-sectional study measuring anxiety at a single point in time (shortly after birth), so we cannot determine causality or how anxiety levels change over time. Longitudinal follow-up would be valuable to see if and when anxiety subsides as neonates recover. The study was conducted in a single tertiary hospital in Punjab, so cultural and healthcare differences limit generalizability. For example, mothers in other regions or countries with different support systems might have different experiences.
In summary, maternal anxiety was markedly higher among NICU mothers compared to matched controls, highlighting NICU admission as a significant maternal stressor. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating family-centered mental health care into the NICU. Healthcare teams should monitor and support maternal psychological well-being alongside neonatal treatment, as improving maternal mental health is likely to benefit both mother and child in the long term. Future research should develop and test targeted interventions (such as tailored counseling or peer support programs) to reduce anxiety in NICU mothers and examine their impact on outcomes for families.
Clinical implications
Routine screening: Implement systematic anxiety screening for mothers in the NICU (e.g., using the PASS) to identify those with elevated distress early on.
Psychosocial support: Provide targeted support services (such as counseling, peer support groups, or referral to mental health professionals) for mothers who exhibit high anxiety scores.
Parental education: Offer clear communication and education about the baby’s condition and care to reduce uncertainty and empower mothers in the NICU environment.
Follow-up care: Arrange mental health follow-up and resources for high-risk mothers after NICU discharge, particularly for young mothers or those who had emergency procedures.
Staff training: Train NICU healthcare providers to recognize signs of maternal distress and to respond by connecting families to appropriate psychosocial resources and support systems.
Limitations
Design and timing: As a cross-sectional case–control study, causal conclusions cannot be drawn and anxiety was measured at only 1 time point. Anxiety levels may change over the course of the neonate’s hospitalization.
Generalizability: The study was conducted in a single hospital and cultural context (Punjab, India), which may limit the applicability of results to other settings or populations.
Self-report assessment: Anxiety was assessed through self-report (PASS),[1] which may be influenced by social desirability or the mother’s current emotional state.
CONCLUSION
The results of our study clearly show that NICU admission places mothers under considerable emotional strain, with anxiety affecting nearly all mothers in this setting. Certain factors - being younger, undergoing a caesarean delivery, or having a female newborn appeared to further elevate this risk. These findings reinforce the need for routine mental health assessment and compassionate support for mothers in the NICU. Prioritizing maternal emotional well-being may positively influence both caregiving confidence and neonatal outcomes.
Acknowledgment:
I would like to express my deep appreciation to my guide, Dr. Ramit Gupta, Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, and my co-guide, Dr. Gurmeet Kaur Brar, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, for their expert guidance, invaluable suggestions, and constant motivation throughout the course of this work.
Ethical approval:
The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, number AU/EC BHR/2K24/559, dated 26th April 2024.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Anxiety symptoms and disorders at 8 weeks postpartum. J Anxiety Disord. 2005;19:295-311.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perinatal anxiety disorder prevalence and incidence. J Affect Disord. 2016;200:148-55.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet. 2014;384:1775-85.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Postpartum depression on the neonatal intensive care unit: Current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:975-87.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression among women with preterm and low-birth-weight infants: A systematic review. BJOG. 2010;117:540-50.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Identifying mothers of very preterm infants at-risk for postpartum depression and anxiety before discharge. J Perinatol. 2013;33:171-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The impact of very premature birth on the psychological health of mothers. Early Hum Dev. 2003;73:61-70.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parental stress in neonatal intensive care units: The influence of social support. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83:403-11.
- [Google Scholar]
- The perinatal anxiety screening scale: Development and preliminary validation. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17:443-54.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Recognizing and screening for postpartum depression in mothers of NICU infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2003;3:37-46.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anxiety levels of mothers with newborns in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Turkey. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31:1176-81.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anxiety levels of mothers with newborns in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1552-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parental mental health in the NICU: A systematic review. J Perinatol. 2024;44:301-10.
- [Google Scholar]
- Predictors of anxiety, depression and stress among mothers of preterm infants in NICU. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33:418-23.
- [Google Scholar]
- Preterm birth and maternal mental health: Insights from a longitudinal study. Pediatrics. 2019;144:e20184096.
- [Google Scholar]
- Maternal anxiety and depression following a premature Infants' discharge from the NICU: Explanatory effects of the COPE program. Nurs Res. 2008;57:383-94.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

